Canadian ecologist C. S. Holling is perhaps the leading proponent of this idea. The concept is rather simple: resilience is a measure of how well a natural system can respond to some perturbation. If an ecosystem is resilient, it will bounce
back--or successfully--adapt to the disturbance. If an ecosystem is not resilient, it will crash. Predictably, one characteristic of resilient ecosystems are intact ecological relationships. Not surprisingly, ecologistsor natural resource managers hope to limit economic and other human activities from severing those relationships so that ecosystems will survive and adapt to change. Too many disturbances can make environments unable to persist.
Unlike most scientists, Holling pushed his ideas beyond his field. Perhaps more accurately, Holling expanded his ecosystem thinking to complex systems more generally. Thus, any complex system--a corporation, a bureaucracy, a government, a society--would behave in some patterned ways. Consequently, human complex systems also needed to be resilient--or adaptive (see previous GreenHumanist post)--to survive in today's modern, technological, complex world. And that requires building and nurturing relationships, local, regional, national, and global. (For links to some of Holling's most influential scientific and theoretical papers, go here.)
Today, the GreenHumanist finished reading Joshua Cooper Ramo's, The Age of the Unthinkable: Why the New World Disorder Constantly Surprises Us and What We Can Do About It (Little, Brown, 2009).
So, add "resilience" to your toolbox for changing the world and creating a culture of sustainability.
0 comments:
Post a Comment